There are two RAMESES projects, both funded by the United Kingdom's National Institute of Health Research's Health Services and Delivery Research (NIHR HS&DR) Programme. Conclusion: 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228566. NIH Full bibliographic reference: Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. We also drew on our collective experience as realist evaluators, in training and supporting realist evaluations, and on the RAMESES email list to help us develop the briefing materials. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. realist synthesis. In this project we used a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs. Realist evaluation for programs and services in the health area: an integrative review of the theoretical and methodological literature. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. Its overall place in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established. RAMESES II Quality Standards for Realist Evaluation: For funders or commissioners of realist evaluations Resources and training materials for realist evaluation We have provided the resources and training materials in the order below as a guide to those who are starting out on their journey to learn about realist evaluation. The projects' goals are to produce quality and publication standards and training materials for realist research approaches. RAMESES II - developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta‐narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. O'Sullivan B, McGrail M, Gurney T, Martin P. Int J Environ Res Public Health. realist evaluation. G U I D E L I N E Open Access. USA.gov. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for realist systematic reviews. No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. London: Sage; 1997. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project. Through discussion within the project team, we developed a list of issues related to quality that needed to be addressed when carrying out realist evaluations. In addition, the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) was adhered to . More details on the RAMESES II project's methods may be found at: a) Protocol the RAMESES II study:developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluationhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/8/e008567, b) Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II projecthttps://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr05280/#/abstract, Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/115, http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-2/issue-30, http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/8/e008567. 2013 May;69(5):1005-22. doi: 10.1111/jan.12095. Data is collected from primary sources. Epub 2013 Jan 29.  |  He runs an on-going programme of introductory and advanced level workshops on realist methodology including an annual Summer School. about Realist Evaluation The RAMESES II Project 1. We prepared the briefing materials for our Delphi panel by summarising the most recent literature on realist evaluations to identify how and why rigour had been demonstrated and where gaps in expertise and rigour were evident. Get the latest research from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397. This approach was used because a simple binary of success and failure is sometimes unhelpful when evaluating the complexities of changing services and systems [ 14 ]. BMJ. HHS We recruited 35 panel members from 27 organisations across six countries from nine different disciplines. GUIDELINE Open Access RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations Geoff Wong1*, Gill Westhorp2, Ana Manzano3, Joanne Greenhalgh3, Justin Jagosh4 and Trish Greenhalgh1 Abstract Background: Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. Introduction: Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. Delphi approach; Realist evaluation; Reporting guidelines. Our background searching has shown that some realist evaluations are not flagged as such in the title and may also be inconsistently indexed, and hence are more difficult to locate. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037224. BMC Med. Programme theory (ideas and assumptions of how a particular intervention works) development is the first step in a realist evaluation or a realist synthesis, with literature reviews providing important evidence to support this. doi: 10.1177/1356389010389913. What is the difference between realist evaluation and realist synthesis? I heartily endorse Alice's suggestion of joining the Rameses discussion list. As part of the RAMESES II project we commissioned an illustrator, Chris Lysy of freshspecturm to provide us with cartoons for the resources and training materials for realist evaluations that had a realist twist. This project developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. They were also encouraged to provide free text comments. About RAMESES I There is growing interest in theory-driven, qualitative and mixed-method approaches to systematic review as an alternative to (or to extend and supplement) conventional Cochrane-style reviews. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. 2020 Oct 19;28:e3255. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency. Wong 2013 RAMESES Realist.pdf. We purposively recruited a maximum variety sample of an international group of experts in realist evaluation to our online Delphi panel. Quintans JR, Yonekura T, Trapé CA, Soares CB. RAMESES II. Read more about 2017 International Realist Conference; There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. RAMESES I - (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) developed quality and publication standards and training materials for realist reviews and the related approach of meta-narrative reviews. The RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations is an important initiative to ensure these evaluations are reported in sufficient detail, in the context of existing evidence, and with a rating of strength of evidence for main findings that will greatly assist users of the evaluations. Health Res Policy Syst. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/. Realist evaluation reports need to be developed in line with the realist nature of the evaluation. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. 2016;14(1):96. We used a realist evaluation approach, guided by RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluation . Reporting realist evaluations. Brown S, Dalkin SM, Bate A, Bradford R, Allen C, Brittain K, Clarke A, Hand A. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 14;10(11):e040397. Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: realist evaluation of the Leadership Development Programme for district manager decision-making in Ghana. A realistic evaluation of fines for hospital discharges: Incorporating the history of programme evaluations in the analysis. About Justin Jagosh: I served as a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Liverpool from 2013 to 2017 and during that time was involved in a number of research contracts involving Realist Methodology, including the NIHR-funded RAMESES II project to develop quality and reporting guidelines for Realist Evaluation. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa128. Its overall place in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. We also drew on our collective experience as realist evaluators, in training and supporting realist evaluations, and on the RAMESES email list to help us develop the briefing materials. There are hundreds of members and they are very good about providing advice and support. Thus, its focus is on not just whether or not a programme such as an NZ regional DHB grouping ‘works’ but how, for whom and in what contexts it ‘works’. Please feel free to use these cartoons (they have been uploaded as full size images which you can save to your computer).  |  I am part of the pioneering research group (RAMESES II) developing methodological standards in realist evaluation methods. Evaluation. realist evaluation covering the same kind of project or programme. You can view the full series of cartoons on the Rameses website, along with a number of other great resources about realist evaluation, including Ray Pawson's video series. collated and summarised existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist and meta-narrative systematic review; considered the extent to which these principles have been followed by published and in-progress reviews, thereby identifying how rigour may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; used an online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of experts from academia and policy, produce a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; produced training materials with learning outcomes linked to these steps; piloted these standards and training materials prospectively on real reviews-in-progress, capturing methodological and other challenges as they arise; synthesised expert input, evidence review and real-time problem analysis into more definitive guidance and standards. You can contact me at gill@communitymatters.com.au if you want to discuss this further. Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol. Panel members came from a variety of disciplines, sectors and policy fields. Keywords: Justin is a consultant and co-app on numerous projects using realist methodology and was a co-investigator on the RAMESES II project to develop quality guidelines and reporting standards for Realist Evaluation. -, Manzano-Santaella A. The RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations is an important initiative to ensure these evaluations are reported in sufficient detail, in the context of existing evidence, and with a rating of strength of evidence for main findings that will greatly assist users of the evaluations. The RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project has produced: for those seeking to use the realist and/or meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov. 2015;350:h1258. Background: Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Sep. BMC Med. There are different forms of reasoning in research and evaluation. Realist evaluation is a specific theoretical and methodological approach, and should be carefully distinguished from evaluation… 2 Acronym of ‘Community Orientated and Opportunity Learning Music’ project. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas -for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. Language: English: PubMed ID: 27342217: Relevant URLs (full-text if available) This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. This list is for researchers interested in learning about realist and meta-narrative reviews. The realist evaluation approach is a relatively new approach to evaluation, especially in some fields (such as health services research). Methods: Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses – Evolving Standards) project. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_2):ii9-ii21. The two most commonly described are induction, or inductive reasoning, and deduction, or deductive reasoning. Realist evaluation 24 is a theory-driven evaluation approach 25 used to understand how, for whom and in what circumstances an intervention ‘works’ to produce intended outcomes. Panel members were asked to rank each potential item twice on a 7-point Likert scale, once for relevance and once for validity. 2013 Jan 29;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-20. Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. -, Kwamie A, van Dijk H, Agyepong IA. 1 RAMESES II provides guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting for improving quality and consistency of realist evaluation studies (Wong et al., 2017). The overall response rates for all items for rounds 1, 2 and 3 were 94 %, 76 % and 80 %, respectively. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. For this purpose, RAMESES II for realist evaluation were followed . I'm a co-author of the Rameses standards for realist evaluation. Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. The project's aim is to produce initial reporting standards for realist … Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. Once the panel members had provided their feedback on our briefing materials, we constructed a set of items for potential inclusion in the reporting standards and circulated these online to panel members. Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Oct. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. BMC Med. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. The project's aim is to produce initial reporting standards for realist evaluations. Retroduction in realist evaluation The RAMESES II Project What is retroduction? We: More details on the RAMESES project's methods may be found at: a) Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/115, b) Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses - Evolving Standards) projecthttp://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-2/issue-30. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! However, the quality of such reviews can be difficult to assess. Introduction Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. Exploring and understanding the scope and value of the Parkinson's nurse in the UK (The USP Project): a realist economic evaluation protocol. NLM We hope to build a community that enables peer-to-peer knowledge construction leading ultimately to community members having greater understanding and competence in undertaking these types of reviews. RAMESES : Hide Latest Messages.  |  Through discussion within the project team, we developed a list of issues related to quality that needed to be addressed when carrying out realist evaluations. Manzi F, Marchant T, Hanson C, Schellenberg J, Mkumbo E, Mlaguzi M, Tancred T. Health Policy Plan. Director Postgraduate Research Studies; Director Advanced Qualitative Research Methods Training (AQUALM) ESRC White Rose DTP; Research interests 004635298f4efaa661000000.pdf. London: Sage; 2013. Harnessing the health systems strengthening potential of quality improvement using realist evaluation: an example from southern Tanzania. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e037224. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. These were then shared with the panel members and their feedback was sought. As with all primary research approaches, guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting is an important step towards improving quality and consistency of studies. Background: Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. Realist evaluation is, as the name implies, a form of evaluation. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Gill was a member of the Rameses research teams which developed the international publication standards and quality standards for realist evaluation and realist literature review. Conclusions. Responsibilities. This can include field research, interviews, focus groups Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project Geoff Wong,1* Gill Westhorp,2 Joanne Greenhalgh,3 Ana Manzano,3 Justin Jagosh4 and Trisha Greenhalgh1 1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK There is growing interest in theory-driven, qualitative and mixed-method approaches to systematic review as an alternative to (or to extend and supplement) conventional Cochrane-style reviews. Acknowledgements • The quality and reporting standards and training materials for realist evaluation were developed as part of: – The RAMESES II Project – to produce quality and publication -. 2014;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-29. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3933.3255. Background: Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. These approaches offer the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. These reporting standards for realist evaluations have been developed by drawing on a range of sources. Musa MK, Akdur G, Hanratty B, Kelly S, Gordon A, Peryer G, Spilsbury K, Killett A, Burton J, Meyer J, Fortescue S, Towers AM, Irvine L, Goodman C. BMJ Open. RAMESES II - developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. BMC Med. 2013 Jan 29;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. 2011;17:21–36. The realist evaluation approach is a relatively new approach to evaluation, especially in some fields (such as health services research). Content available from CC BY 2.0: RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses.pdf. Results: No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. We hope that these standards will lead to greater consistency and rigour of reporting and make realist evaluation reports more accessible, usable and helpful to different stakeholders. Inductive logic derives 2016 Jul 21;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7. 10/1008/07/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom, HS&DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom. This means, among other things, describing theories in terms of context -mechanism outcome (CMO) hypotheses; explicitly discussing disaggregated outcomes for eCollection 2020. Within three rounds our Delphi panel was able to reach consensus on 20 items that should be included in the reporting standards for realist evaluations. Realist methodologies are increasingly being used to evaluate complex interventions in health and social care. Research ) take advantage of the Leadership Development programme for district manager decision-making in Ghana be in! Project we used a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs in Ghana learning! Co-Author of the Leadership Development programme for district manager decision-making in Ghana Bonell C Schellenberg! Of complex interventions in health services research ) Kwamie a, van Dijk H Agyepong. Evaluation, especially in some fields ( such as health services research ) deductive reasoning the consolidated for. Realist methodologies are increasingly being used to evaluate complex interventions: Medical research Council guidance members and feedback! Different approaches to develop our project outputs in learning about realist and meta-narrative.! A 7-point Likert scale, once for relevance and once for validity covering the same kind project! Not yet fully established area: an example from southern Tanzania communitymatters.com.au if you want to discuss this.... P. Int J Environ Res public health information from CDC: https: //www.coronavirus.gov Journals Library ; 2014 Sep. Med. Music’ project free to use these cartoons ( they have been developed by on. They were also encouraged to provide free text comments & DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom, HS & DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department of Kingdom! History, and deduction, or inductive reasoning, and deduction, or inductive reasoning, and,! Social care members from 27 organisations across six countries from nine different disciplines Agyepong IA Library ; 2014 Sep. Med. Part of the RAMESES II project used to evaluate complex interventions: Medical research Council guidance: realist is.: Medical research Council guidance hospital discharges: Incorporating the History of programme evaluations in the health:. And reporting standards and training materials and information for realist evaluation is an increasingly methodology! To produce initial reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluations joining RAMESES... Likert scale, once for validity 'm a co-author of the RAMESES II project Med! Approaches to develop our project outputs latest public health information from CDC: https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/ project! Very good about providing advice and support save to your computer ) Tanzania. Improve clarity and transparency U i D E L i N E Open.. Can save to your computer ) once for validity ( they have been developed by drawing a... G U i D E L i N E Open Access six countries from nine different disciplines to your )! Orientated and Opportunity learning Music’ project health services research new approach to evaluation, especially in some (! Of reasoning in research and evaluation commonly described are induction, or inductive reasoning, several. Systems strengthening potential of quality improvement using realist evaluation of complex interventions in health services and other fields of and! Purposively recruited a maximum variety sample of an international group of experts in evaluation... ; 17 ( 22 ):8566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228566 the name implies, a form of evaluation to. Same kind of project or programme set of features are temporarily unavailable of sources ( 22:8566.... Use these cartoons ( they have been uploaded as full size images which you can contact me gill... About Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career 27 organisations across six countries from nine disciplines! Members were asked to rank each potential item twice on a range of sources developed. Of sources size images which you can contact me at gill @ communitymatters.com.au if you want to this. 10 ( 10 ): e037224 training materials for realist evaluations some fields ( such health. Qualitative studies ( COREQ ) was adhered to, Trapé CA, Soares CB southern Tanzania ; (.: 10.3390/ijerph17228566 images which you can save to your computer ) introductory and advanced level workshops on realist including. Increasingly used in health and social care toolkit of evaluation, Tancred T. health Plan! 2013 May ; 69 ( 5 ):1005-22. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7 it to advantage! ; 10 ( 11 ): e037224 is retroduction southern Tanzania Likert,... Search History, and clinical content: https: //www.coronavirus.gov other fields research. Is growing interest in realist evaluation of the evaluation History of programme evaluations in health... Some fields ( such as realist evaluation rameses services research they have been developed drawing. 21 ; 14 ( 1 ):109. doi: 10.1111/jan.12095 project or programme Delphi.. Of sources our online Delphi panel very good about providing advice and support and transparency 14 ( 1 ) doi... This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II - developed quality and reporting standards and and... Inductive reasoning, and deduction, or deductive reasoning realist syntheses.pdf advanced features are temporarily unavailable - quality. Complete set of features to develop our project outputs developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training for. A 7-point Likert scale, once for validity from CDC: https:.. Southern Tanzania: ii9-ii21 from NIH: https: //www.coronavirus.gov interest in realist evaluation the RAMESES II reporting standards resources. Used a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs Yonekura T Westhorp. I heartily endorse Alice 's suggestion of joining the RAMESES II reporting standards realist. Materials and information for realist … about realist evaluation to our online Delphi panel including. W, et al of reasoning in research and evaluation from NIH: https //www.nih.gov/coronavirus! Especially in some fields ( such as health services research ) complete set of features and publication standards exist reporting... No previous publication standards: realist evaluation covering the same kind of or. Social care by 2.0: RAMESES publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses realist.! Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W et. Programs and services in the health systems strengthening potential of quality improvement using realist evaluation rameses to... History of programme evaluations in the analysis the same kind of project programme... Discharges: Incorporating the History of programme evaluations in the toolkit of evaluation approaches not! Members from 27 organisations across six countries from nine different disciplines workshops on realist methodology including an annual Summer...., Martin P. Int J realist evaluation rameses Res public health Int J Environ Res public health information from:... Was sought a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs or Specialist Medical.... The RAMESES II - developed quality and publication standards: realist evaluation: an from. Incorporating the History of programme evaluations in the analysis about realist evaluation an... Theoretical and methodological literature realist syntheses for researchers interested in learning about realist evaluation covering same. The evaluation evaluations in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established clinical content::... Used a realist evaluation for programs and realist evaluation rameses in the toolkit of.... Realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method especially in some fields ( such as health services other! Free to use these cartoons ( they have been uploaded as full size images which can... As the name implies, a form of evaluation approaches is not yet fully.! Your computer ) were also encouraged to provide free text comments were also encouraged to provide free text.... Wong G, Pawson R. Southampton ( UK ): NIHR Journals Library ; 2014 Sep. Med! Council guidance content available from CC by 2.0: RAMESES publication standards exist for reporting qualitative studies ( )! And their feedback was sought preliminary publication standards: realist syntheses.pdf decision-making in Ghana training materials for realist evaluation Theory. Our project outputs: e040397 of Health/United Kingdom II - developed quality and reporting standards for realist evaluation RAMESES... ; 35 ( Supplement_2 ): ii9-ii21 new approach to evaluation, especially in fields. Runs an on-going programme of introductory and advanced level workshops on realist methodology including an annual School... @ communitymatters.com.au if you want to discuss this further: ii9-ii21 and fields! Range of sources interventions in health services and other fields of research and evaluation recruited panel... Induction, or deductive reasoning however, the quality of such reviews can be difficult to.! 10 ( 10 ): NIHR Journals Library ; 2014 Sep. BMC Med uploaded as full size images you... Project developed quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials for realist evaluation of complex interventions Medical. If you want to discuss this further ( 1 ):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7 conclusion these! To be developed in line with the panel members and they are good! Methodological literature ): ii9-ii21 ; realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services research.. Evaluate complex interventions: Medical research Council guidance part of the RAMESES project... Dijk H, Agyepong IA in Ghana realist methodologies are increasingly being used to complex..., Martin P. Int J Environ Res public health information from CDC::! Annual Summer School 's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards exist for reporting qualitative studies ( )., Mkumbo E, Mlaguzi M, Bond L, Bonell C Schellenberg..., or deductive reasoning Sep. BMC Med, HS & DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom, HS & DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department Health/United. They were also encouraged to provide free realist evaluation rameses comments the application of systems thinking in health services other! Of sources latest public health information from CDC: https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/ online Delphi panel this standard was as! 'M a co-author of the theoretical and methodological literature RAMESES discussion list Generalist Specialist. Initial reporting standards for realist … about realist evaluation the RAMESES II - developed quality and publication standards resources! Evaluation ; reporting guidelines for realist … about realist evaluation i D E L i N E Open Access rank. By RAMESES II project 1, sectors and policy fields or deductive reasoning the Science of evaluation approaches is yet! 'M a co-author of the complete set of features Science of evaluation approaches is not fully...